Wednesday, October 26, 2005

Flannel and the WNBA

Basketball coaches will make you teh ghey.

14 comments:

Li'l Em said...

Wow. That was actually incredibly brave and honest of her. Even if you do not recognize homosexuality as legitimate, this is probably one of the most thoughtful, intelligent and straightforward things I've read all week.

More on my blog, so I don't write one long-ass comment and annoy all your chums.

Rycrisp said...

It'd be brave if she didn't play in the WNBA. Like, maybe if she was a female golfer. Oh. Wait.

Rycrisp said...

Thtop! My blog ith THO not gay! There's a difference between gayness and bestiality.

Li'l Em said...

I meant it was brave to put something like that out in ESPN or other media outlets. I agree that women are nowhere NEAR as threatened by their sexuality as men are threatened by other men's sexuality.

Though I'm sure some football players at McGill would beg to differ.

Anonymous said...

Homosexuality, Bisexuality, Heterosexuality.

All terms that artificially limit ones relationships to some phony pre-prescribed formula based on some ancient, archaic notion of right and wrong, morality or immorality.

I say Embrace the Person. Don't get hung up on such restrictive suburban notions such as "I only have relations with a Man" or "I only date women."

Bullshit, I say.

Expand your horizons. Break down your homophobic barriers. Double your odds. Get into People.

Your Friendly Neighborhood
Spiderman

Rycrisp said...

Spidey! Now, do you mean that literally? "Get into people." Because. Y'know. That's kinda gay.

Anonymous said...

But that is my point, Right and Krispy. The term "Gay" is so passee.

For and example, the mores of 19th century America did not allow, even contemplate, relationships, not to mention marriage, between different races.

In 2005, we are enjoying a similar evolution in our acceptance of various sexual partners.

It's not about Gay, Straight or whatever.

It's about pleasurable sensations caused by another warm, breathing human being.

Open up your thinking, Crisp and Rye. You are clearly uptight with the whole "Gay" fixation your on.

And how does a fellow meet up with the much more broad minded "Chris the Amber Alert"?

I have a feeling he and I share the same philosophy on sexual partnering.

Down with Sexual Assignment! Up with...well, I think you know.

Anonymous said...

Why are you making such an issue out of such a non-issue?

Anonymous said...

Excatly, Mr. Slag.

BTW, are you a believer in my philosophy?

If so, email me privately.

Anonymous said...

Oh, okay, 'anonymous'. I'll get right on that. So are you saying that if a homosexual started dating someone of the opposite sex they would be desciminated against? You know, one time my cat meowed and it almost sounded like a bark. The other cats in the nieghborhood have never treated her the same since. But if you think about it, terms like "cat" and "dog" just artificially limit ones physical characterisics to some phony pre-prescribed formula based on some ancient, archaic notion of "biology". What's wrong with calling a gay person gay, a straight person straight, and a bi person bi? Not everyone walks around just looking for holes and/or huge black double ended dildos. Most people actually prefer men or woman or both, and that classifies them. You sound like those people who say shit like "What? You're BLACK? I never noticed, I just don't pay attention to things like race..."

Anonymous said...

Mr. Slag, I wish you were not so defensive. If you were not, you would see that you are actually making my point.

I would assume you have friends who are of color. I am quite certain that they became your friends because of the quality of their charachter, not the color of their skin.

Why can't we view our sexual partners the same way? Why can't two warm, thriving human beings bring relief to one another without using terms like "Homo" or "Lesbo" or "Straight"?

We are on the verge of a world wide recognition that sexual satisfaction can be achieved through relations with another caring human without classifying the nature of that contact on the basis of the gender of our sexual partner.

BTW, you speak of cats and dogs with no small amount of adoration. Are you into that kind of relationship? If so, I have a good story about that too I will share based on your response.

Down with sexist classification of our partners!!

Anonymous said...

I didn't use terms like 'Homo' or 'Lesbo'. My point is that if I'm gay (which I'm not, Karl is), then there's nothing wrong with referring to myself that way. Same goes for lesbian, bi and straight. Call it like you see it. I think it's overly PC to say something like 'Person A is just a male person who happens to be attracted to other male people.' Or, 'Karl just so happens to enjoy eating little Asian dick.' No, Person A is gay, and Karl is a pervert.

If your argument is that there's nothing wrong with being gay, you're like, 10 years too late cuz everyone here already knows that. Beyond that, save it for the newsletter.

Rycrisp said...

Slag-"IF" I'm gay!
Leavin' that door open. The back door! NEeeeeyahahahahaha!

Anonymous said...

So, Mr. Slag, are you saying I have a chance?